Calculation first, AI second
The underlying PlanSIP screen/calculation should stand on its own. AI receives result context to explain it; it should not secretly replace deterministic calculations with invented numbers.
PlanSIP uses AI as an explanation layer around calculations and historical data. The AI can help translate a result into plain language, compare trade-offs and surface questions to verify. It is not allowed to turn uncertainty into a guaranteed recommendation.
Created & maintained by: Vinay S Jain • Last reviewed: 18 August 2026 • Educational analysis only
The underlying PlanSIP screen/calculation should stand on its own. AI receives result context to explain it; it should not secretly replace deterministic calculations with invented numbers.
It cannot know future returns, your full financial life or every latest scheme document unless that information is supplied and verified. It can also make mistakes.
If AI is unavailable, the core calculators and historical analysis remain the primary result. Users should verify important financial facts using official sources.
Instead of saying “Fund A is best,” a useful AI explanation should identify whether the categories differ, compare drawdown/volatility, note missing history and explain that similar past CAGR does not make the funds interchangeable.
Inputs, assumptions and limitations are shown rather than hidden behind a single recommendation. Historical data and estimated future returns are treated differently. A screen or score is a research aid, not a buy signal.